Different
forms of essay format
short response answer to extended response answer.
Essay writing at SPM level are divided into two parts:
short response answer to extended response answer.
Essay writing at SPM level are divided into two parts:
ü
Directed writing - provides structure to the students and
expects the students to write according to the prompts given
ü
Continous writing - expects the students to draw
upon their experience and past knowledge as well as knowledge of writing
conventions.
Advantages
of the essay format
·
can assess higher order skills
ü students
are able to analyse,synthesis and evaluate through topics that require students
to argue or express their opinions.
·
emphasises communication skills
ü important
aspect in social relations
·
eliminates guessing
ü unlikely
to occur in essay because students need to provide more ideas on their own.
·
relatively easy to construct
ü within
few minutes,the questions are easy to construct rather than constructing
other test formats.
Disadvantages
of the essay format
·
can only test a limited amount of
content if compared to multiple choice type questions.
·
prone to bluffing by the students.
ü repeating
the same idea so that the teacher will be impressed by the length of essay.
·
essays tend to be less reliable than
other test format.
ü different
graders have different impressions of a single essay.
ü help
the students by providing clear guidelines.
·
essays are difficult to score.
ü consume
more times to grade the students essay as you need to decide which scoring
approach to use.
Approaches
to scoring essay
·
there are three major approaches to
scoring essays which is :
ü holistic
scoring
v readers
react to the students' composition as a whole and and a single score is awarded
to the writing
v The
rank would be from 1-6.
v example:
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
Vocab is
precise,vivid and varied
|
Vocab is adequate for
grade level
|
Vocab is simple
|
Vocab is limited and
repetitions
|
Respond with few
isolated words
|
No response
|
Meaning is conveyed
easily
|
Meaning is conveyed but
break down at times
|
Meaning is frequently
not clear
|
Meaning is unclear
|
No complete sentences
are written
|
No response
|
Transition
from one idea to another
idea
is smooth and provides readers with clear understanding.
|
Some transitions of
idea is evident
|
There are few
transition markers or repetitive transition markers
|
No transitions
markers
|
No evidence of
concepts of writing
|
No response
|
A few mechanical
errors are present but there are no disrupts in communication
|
Mechanical errors are
present but does not disrupt the communication
|
Mechanical errors
disrupt communication
|
Mechanical errors
cause serious disruption in communication.
|
-
|
No response
|
v primary
trait scoring are related to holistic scoring because primary trait scoring
focuses on certain functional criteria based on the purpose of the writing and
the grade will be given based on how well the students are able to express that
function.
ü analytical
scoring
v raters
access students'performance on a variety of categorieswhich are hypothesised to
make up the skill of writing.
v some
possible contents used in assessing writing ability using an analytic scoring:
Content
organisation
language use
vocabulary
mechanics
ü objective
scoring
v this
approach relies on the quantified methods of evaluating students writing.
v this
scoring will be conducted by :
establish standardization by limiting
the length of the assessment.
identify the elements to be assessed-go
through the essay up to 250 words and highlight all the mistakes from spelling
to mechanics.
operationalise the assessment-assign a
weight score for each mistake range from 1-3.
Quantify the assessment- 250 (words) = 3.52 correctness score
71 (sum of errors)
Comparison of three
approaches
Holistic Scoring
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
·
quickly graded
·
provide a public standard that is
understood by the teachers and students alike
·
relatively higher degree of rater
reliability
·
applicable to the assessment of
many different topics.
·
emphasise the students strength
rather than their weakness.
|
·
the single score can actually
mask the differences across students compositions.
·
does not provide a lot of
diagnostic feedback.
|
|
Analytical Scoring
|
·
provides clear guidelines in
grading in the form of various components.
·
allow the graders to consciously address
important aspects of writing.
|
·
writing ability is unmaturally
split up into components.
|
Objective in scoring
|
·
objectivity in scoring
·
grading a paper can be stopped
and resumed with ease even after a period of time as the consistency or reliability
of scoring is maintained.
|
·
still some degree of subjectivity
is involved.
·
accentuates negative aspects of
the learners writing without giving credit for what they can do well.
|
Ensuring
accurate scoring of essays
Familiarisation
with scale
·
familiarisation is important to achieve
a valid and accurate scores.
·
graders should be familiar with the scoring criteria so that the if bands are
involved,they would know what does each band requires.
Identifying
benchmark papers
·
this step is to provide a clear and
representative example of students work according to the grading criteria.
·
Bands can only provide general description of what is expected
meanwhile benchmark papers provide concrete examples and help ensure fairness
in grading.
Grading
·
Norming
ü papers
are stacked together and divided according to the band
ü read
each paper more closely and state our first impression
·
Final Grades
ü when
we need to assign more precise numerical scores
ü grade
all students on one essay first before moving on to the next essay in order to
ensure more consistent grading.
No comments:
Post a Comment